Junior Science Refresher this is science magazine in india published this is article page no 71 we know the president said ostensibly that the reason for invading was to find weapons of mass destruction and prevent saddam hussein from using them. his removal from office could create a new democratic iraq. america invaded and found no weapons of mass destruction – not even a hint of them. now the media is basically reporting that we are involved in a civil war in iraq and we are losing it. somewhere in between the two ends of the story is the truth and you need to know it so that you dont have to be inundated with bias from all sides of the media both liberal and conservative. lets go through the great myths of iraq. myth 1 – invading iraq has helped us with the war on terrorism nonsense there is no war on terrorism in iraq. osama bin laden attacked the two world trade center buildings in nyc more than five years ago. hello has anybody heard recently whether anybody is looking for bin laden anymore. if so who what resources are being devoted to taking down this awful hateful man? i suggest very little is being done. everyones attention is on iraq. saddam hussein was not an exporter of terror. he used terror as an internal weapon inside iraq to control the very people that we obviously cant control. these people do not want a democracy if they did they would fight for it. instead they fight each other even in the same neighborhoods. its a civil war folks pure and simple. myth 2 – the militarys post war planning was okay not great but okay? really donald rumsfelds defense department could not have done a worse job if they had set out to do one as an objective. there was literally zero post war planning compared to the actual invasion that took place junior science refresher magazine.
No comments:
Post a Comment